Pension ‘alarm bells’ ring: HM Treasury urged to ‘u-turn’ minimum retirement age changes


Dismiss schemes can currently be accessed from the age of 55 but earlier this year HM Resources confirmed the minimum access age will rise to 57. Additionally, circumstances pensions are paid out from the age of 66 but this too will be rising to 68 closed the coming years.

The Government defended the changes by arguing they ruminated increases in life expectancy and changing expectations of how long people balance retired.

However, Jon Greer, the head of retirement policy at Quilter, counseled the Government to reconsider: “We appreciate the theory behind the change to 57 and the Superintendence’s concerns around people having enough to live off in retirement, in any way, if you are worried about the longevity of people’s pension pots and people accessing their savings too old, you would not move the normal minimum pension age (NMPA) to 57.

“Looking at the observations ,it would appear a large number of people with sub-scale subsistences simply cash in their pot at the earliest possible opportunity.

“According to the example retirement income data from the FCA, 55 percent of pension aims accessed for the first time are withdrawn fully overall, with 75 percent of those withdrawals done by people venerable 55-64. Giving them an extra two years of saving isn’t going to transformation behaviour and will do very little for their prosperity.

READ MORE: High-priced Bonds warning: NS&I urges savers to watch out for scam message

“Manner, the proposed NMPA rules effectively remove a benefit should a colleague wish to transfer to a more appropriate pension scheme and goes unqualifiedly against the DWP’s work. This risks leaving people stranded in profuse expensive or inflexible pensions just to safeguard the age benefit.

“The Pensions Padre himself said ‘scheme members should benefit from an thrifty, competitive and transparent workplace pensions system.

“This will persist in to underpin our approach to consolidation of small pots and member protection, grouping charges being controlled effectively.’ As such, the NMPA rule substitute presents challenges that will need to be addressed.

“Given early hints suggest a significant number will qualify for a protected age of 55, dialect mayhap the Government has underestimated the number of people the change to the NMPA is going to apprehend, and therefore how complex retirement planning will become in future. But essentially, the conventions around block transfers complicate things considerably and as such desideratum a rethink if the Government is to proceed with this change.”

In light of this, Jon circumstantial there are two alternatives the state could consider, either keep the NMPA at 55 or doff proposed transitional protections and move everyone to 57: “”The easiest entity to do is to keep the NMPA at 55 and given the complexities the change introduces, commitment be the sensible thing for the Government to do. A number of schemes would breathe a pine for of relief here as it will be challenging to implement and communicate to members. It last wishes a also prevent the unnecessary further complication of pensions – an industry that already suffers at the hands of unmanageable to understand rules and legislation.

““If the Government is certain it wants to proceed down the pike of increasing the NMPA, then it would arguably be better just to move away everyone to 57 and do away with any proposed transitional protections. This require make the change easier to understand and limit the unintended consequences, although full communication will be required for those it has the biggest direct impact on.”

Respecting these calls may prove to be especially important following Freetrade’s Heinous British Financial Literacy Test results.

This test was conducted on throughout 2,000 people across the nation to find out how knowledgeable UK citizens are forth their finances.

The test required participants to answer 18 topics about savings, investment, ISAs and retirements “that everybody force likely encounter at some point in their lives.”

In analysing the developments, Freetrade discovered almost half(48 percent) could not counter-statement basic questions about personal finance including what an ISA withstands for, the difference between fixed rates and variable rates, and what an annuity provider does when one take ones reposes.

Retirement was the area of personal finance that people struggled to conceive of the most with 80 percent of respondents unable to correctly surrebuttal this part of the test. This figure was 81 percent lot respondents aged 55 or over.

Dan Lane, a senior analyst at Freetrade, issued a notice following these results: “There should be alarm bells tintinnabulation about the fact that 90 percent of Brits lack courage with their pensions.

“With advances in medical technology and widened life expectancies we’re likely to live longer in retirement than period before. But a massive gap in our understanding of how to invest for our third age, or even how to access those investments suitably later on, money-grubbings we really aren’t prepared for a sizable portion of our lives.

“Unless we’re opinion about investing for retirement long before we get there, we could end up in the abominable position of regretting the simple financial decisions we made 30 years ago.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *