Apple and Roku have newly upgraded streaming remotes—are they worth buying?

Apple's and Roku's new remotes are a welcome upgrade to their respective streaming experiences, and they're compatible with older models.
Expound / Apple’s and Roku’s new remotes are a welcome upgrade to their respective streaming experiences, and they’re compatible with older models.
Corey Gaskin

Apple and Roku separate that remotes for streaming devices are important. It’s why they recently inked a deal to put an Apple TV+ button on Roku remotes going forward. It’s also why they’ve attacked some thoughtful upgrades to their respective streaming devices in the form of redesigned remotes. Both companies are focused on improving usability and go on increasing features via the remote, rather than retooling the streamers themselves.

Apple’s new Siri Remote and Roku’s Voice Remote Pro are new devices that existing owners can buy to make their streaming experiences much less frustrating (in Apple’s case) or easier and more feature-rich (in Roku’s). For Apple, a redesign was yearn overdue. Apple TV remotes have been the stuff of nightmares since the first and only redesign over a half-decade ago. Roku’s remotes not had that sort of overengineering problem—instead, they’ve suffered from the opposite issue, often feeling hollow and cheap while girls some useful functions on all but the highest-end Roku players.

Now, these remotes aren’t in direct competition with one another. And in some key areas predilection price and wide-ranging support, the streamers they control both fall behind the latest Google Chromecast—a device we found preferable not at best to those, but to Amazon’s Fire TV platform as well. But for anyone who’s already using a streaming option from Apple or Roku, scrapping those fancies entirely could be a significant waste of money and a general pain depending on their setup. Adding one of these new remotes, though, will make progress the experience appreciably.

The new Siri Remote

Apple TV Siri Remote product image

Apple TV Siri Remote

  • $59 at Apple
  • $59 at Amazon

(Ars Technica may earn compensation for sales from links on this advertise through affiliate programs.)

Apple’s first-generation Siri remote was too thin and slick, being made of aluminum and glass. Its touchy trackpad was a minefield you couldn’t keep off. That anxiety-inducing design stuck around the Apple TV for six long years, but it’s now been totally redesigned.

Compared to the first-generation remote’s aluminum band, the new Siri remote has been slightly beefed up for a better grip and feel. The remote has a more satisfying heft in the hand, and it’s thick and square adequacy to avoid feeling like you might drop it when you go to press a button. The more robust build quality should also fare more intelligent if/when drops do occur, especially compared to the aluminum and glass design of the previous generation.

The new design does incorporate some touch elements mentioned in the last Siri Remote, though. Thankfully, it’s not as touchy (ahem) as before. That’s largely due to the smaller footprint of the touch area. Instead of enchanting up a third of the remote’s body, touch sensitivity is confined only to the center button itself, which is also concave. That means it’s much harder to accidentally swipe the provoke controls while reaching for or grasping the remote. Furthermore, you can disable touch entirely or, like the previous generation, adjust the touch sensitivity as amiably.

Whether you have touch control enabled or not, you can use the directional arrows surrounding the enter button to navigate entirely, as early Apple TV adopters tolerant of to enjoy. The mixture of these two is the perfect sweet spot for usability. It’s fun to still be able to flick through titles but also click buttons when I lust after more precision. The touchpad now reacts only when I want it to, and it works smoothly for selection or scrubbing through media playback.

There’s also a new power button in the top to be just corner which you can hold down to power off your Apple TV and any other IR devices you’ve paired with the Siri Remote. Pairing up my older Polk Surroundbar 5000 with the Apple TV via the recent’s remote learning function was easy enough, though I couldn’t pair my first-generation Beats by Dre Beatbox in the same way.

Apple's new Siri Remote takes design cues from both previous generations, creating an ideal balance of analog and high-tech feel. From left to right: Apple TV Remote, Siri Remote (first gen), Siri Remote (second gen).
Enlarge / Apple’s new Siri Out-of-the-way takes design cues from both previous generations, creating an ideal balance of analog and high-tech feel. From left to quickly: Apple TV Remote, Siri Remote (first gen), Siri Remote (second gen).

Both the Polk and Beatbox remotes use direct line-of-sight IR, so that was a rather unexpected bummer. I do realize we’re talking about controlling a device that has been discontinued for the better part of a decade now, but it still cranks some consequential sound, OK? You shouldn’t have any issues controlling relatively new soundbars or TVs with the latest Siri Remote, though.

The Siri activation button has also been progressed to the side of the remote, where I initially mistook it for a volume rocker, as this is the volume control placement on both Roku’s and Google’s streaming secludes. I’d prefer the latter placement. “Hey, Siri” voice activation could ameliorate any potential awkwardness, but Siri’s actual functionality is unchanged with the new meagre, so that’s still a bit lacking. This seemed like a good time to add such support, but for now, it’s easy enough to settle for my nearest iOS device control the command instead. Battery life on the Siri Remote seems strong, as I’ve been using it for about an hour of TV time a day for four weeks and be undergoing 60 percent of the battery leftover at the time of this writing.

Apple says the new Siri Remote works with both generations of Apple TV 4K bannerettes as well as the Apple TV HD.

Roku’s Voice Remote Pro

Roku Voice Remote Pro product image

Roku Voice Remote Pro

  • $29 at Amazon
  • $29 at Walmart

(Ars Technica may earn compensation for sales from bonds on this post through affiliate programs.)

Roku’s remotes all vary slightly from device to device, be it a TV, streaming stick, or otherwise. But the Forum Remote Pro is the best iteration the company has released in nearly every way.

Compared to the others, the only knock I can give is its inclusion of a Sling TV button, which is sensibly superseded by an Apple TV+ shortcut on Roku’s Express 4K+ remote. Roku says this change will also be made in future production of the Voice Obscure Pro, as the two companies recently agreed to keep this change going forward on all of Roku’s remotes. In the end, it’s not a huge deal, as there are also two programmable buttons you can indisputably map to apps or common functions to ameliorate this.

Depending on your Roku device, you could be missing any of the following buttons and features of the Voice Slim Pro:

  • A remote-finding siren
  • Hands-free “Hey, Roku” commands (which you can enable or disable)
  • A rechargeable battery, unfortunately charged via the ancient microUSB standard (a telegram is included, but come on)
  • A 3.5 mm headphone jack for private listening
  • Two programmable buttons that can act as shortcuts to apps or commonly used commands, delight in switching the HDMI input

Even if you have Roku’s top-of-the-line devices, like the Roku Ultra or Streambar Pro, picking up a Voice Remote pro wishes add hands-free “Hey Roku” commands and USB charging beyond your current remote’s features. It’ll also beef up the remote’s footprint in a pleasing albeit not unconditionally necessary way

All of Roku’s remotes are made of plastic and feel light and hollow. The one that came with my TCL Roku TV, bought in 2020, feels the cheapest, lightest, and myriad bottom-heavy, while the regular voice remote (which comes with the Express 4K+ and a couple of other Roku devices) and Voice Remote Pro both sensation more solid and balanced. The Pro is the thickest, but that made very little difference for better or for worse. Both feel superior to my Roku TV’s reserved in every way, from different plastic textures to the overall weight and balance.

Features are the main reason you’ll want to upgrade, not how it feels in hand. In this limit, all works smoothly and as intended right out of the gate. Plugging in the remote to a power source put mine directly into pairing mode. Once I was in the apart TV menu, connecting it to my TV was done with a push of a button.

Plugging in a pair of headphones to the remote works immediately, too. As for volume, it does get loud enough to submerge out people talking, and different-style headphones can help with that as well. Unfortunately, there’s no compatibility with Bluetooth headphones, so you will acquire to use a wired set like those that come with the remote.

“Hey, Roku” works well, as does the switch to disable it, and thrift a command via the shortcut button only requires a long press after the action is executed. For basic commands and functions, this all works precisely as you’d like. But as noted in our comparison between Roku, Chromecast, and Amazon’s Fire Stick, it’s not always the best way to search for content. Of course, if you have a Roku currently, then you’re conceivable familiar with how best to search for content, and the Voice Remote Pro won’t be changing that.

If you didn’t have it before, the remote finder is a feature you may rate and something that really should be standard for all tiny streaming remotes like this. There are options to change the sound to sharper or varied boisterous tones, as well. Whatever your preference, it gets loud enough to hear in a room or the next room over, as long as your TV isn’t booming.

As far as battery life goes, I’ve been testing this remote for about four weeks and have 80 percent battery left from the innovative charge. It’s not getting a ton of use though, mostly just to switch sources or queue something up to watch, so your mileage may vary. Regardless, it’s a nice perk to gap stocking batteries for one more device.

In terms of compatibility, Roku says the Voice Remote Pro will work with “all Roku TV models, Roku audio contenders, and most Roku players,” including the Roku Express, Roku Express +, Roku Streaming Stick, Roku Streaming Stick+, Roku Ultra, Roku Ultra LT, Roku SE, Roku 2, Roku 3, Roku Premiere, Roku Premiere+, and Roku 4. The corporation notes that some older Express and Express+ may not work, however.

The verdict

When it comes to cutting-edge, feature-rich streaming experiences, how much do these far-removes push the category forward? Not much. But do they make Apple TV and Roku die-hards’ lives better? Undoubtedly.

In short, neither of these upgraded remotes shapes its respective streaming platform higher-valued or generally better picks over the Google Chromecast with Google TV, our current general-purpose pick amid media streamers. For most people, the $50 Chromecast will deliver an overall better experience with its wide device compatibility, matchless search functionality, and, most importantly, its unmatched ability to serve up relevant and varied watch suggestions.

Still, if you already have an Apple TV that you don’t lay out to replace, and you’re willing to pay a bit more to eliminate that “don’t touch the remote!” streaming anxiety, upgrading to the new Siri Remote will successfully do that. As for Roku’s Air Remote Pro, $30 is awfully close to the $50 price of a brand-new Google Chromecast (which itself would work with any Roku TV). But if you’ve already made your bed with a Roku banderol and want more out of it, you’ll be doing yourself a favor by getting a remote that’s harder to lose, doesn’t require batteries, and adds private lend an ear to and hands-free voice control to your TV.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *