NHS whistleblowers could be defended against discrimination if they apply to work for the health service again.
Superintendence plans would give applicants a right to complain to an employment judiciary if they believed they had suffered discrimination.
Jeremy Hunt voted he wanted to create «a culture of openness» where staff feel they can be significant mention up about patient safety.
Barrister Sir Robert Francis recommended the resolution after a public inquiry into Stafford Hospital deaths.
Keep safe NHS whistleblowers was a key recommendation from the inquiry into the scandal, which resulted in the group that ran Stafford Hospital being fined £500,000 for «basic» errors linked to the deaths of four patients.
‘Listened to, not vilified’
Sir Robert, the investigation chairman, warned that staff often faced bullying and isolation if they try ones hand ated to speak out and that staff struggled to find new jobs in the NHS.
Under the UK-wide plots, applicants for an NHS job would have the right to complain to an employment tribunal if they had been tell the differenced against because they had previously raised concerns about the protection of patients.
Applicants would also have the right to bring a affirm in court in order to prevent discriminatory conduct.
And the draft guidelines, which are out for consultation, say that taste of an applicant by an NHS worker should be treated like discrimination by the NHS body itself.
Haleness Secretary Mr Hunt said: «Today we move another step nearer to creating a culture of openness in the NHS, where people who have the courage to utter in up about patient safety concerns are listened to, not vilified.»
He said the interchanges would ensure «staff feel they are protected with the law on their side».
‘Deeper cultural emotionally upset’
There has been a growing focus on patient safety since Sir Robert’s enquiry in 2013.
One of the main findings of that report was that people within the NHS had known alongside the poor levels of care at the hospital, but did not raise the alarm.
Since then, a issue of initiatives have been launched to improve safety.
In 2015, the oversight introduced plans to appoint guardians to support staff who wanted to discourse upon up about concerns over patient safety.
Peter Walsh, chief director of Action against Medical Accidents, said the plans were reasonable, but a «welcome move in the right direction».
«It is clearly unfair that truncheon who have been forced to become ‘whistleblowers’ should be discriminated against when they try alternative jobs.
«However, this is a symptom of a much deeper cultural hard in the NHS which will not be solved with tinkering with rules here and there.
«So far we keep not seen a joined-up approach to supporting and protecting staff from unfair treatment when they try to do the prerogative thing and end up having to be whistleblowers.»
Mr Walsh said many NHS trusts had still not set guardians, as recommended by the Stafford Hospital inquiry.
The current consultation is unreserved for eight weeks and will close on 12 May.