Theresa May’s university review will not scrap fees


Compromise playback is unsupported on your device

The prime minister has called for think twice value for students in England, but has ruled out completely scrapping tuition pays.

Theresa May has launched her review of tuition fees and university funding, to be throned by the author and financier, Philip Augar.

Labour has said it would expunge fees and bring back maintenance grants.

But Mrs May said scrapping costs would push up taxes and mean limiting the number of university puts.

The prime minister, in a speech in Derby, said she remained committed to the idea that students «who benefit directly from higher education should provide directly towards the cost of it».

Announcing the year-long review of student back and university funding, Mrs May warned that the system has failed to deliver enough competition on price.

Almost all courses are charged at the maximum £9,250 per year and provoke rates are up to 6.1%.

The prime minister said students in England faced «one of the most up-market systems of university tuition in the world» and «the level of fees charged do not have reference to to the cost or quality of the course».

Fee freeze to stay

There are «serious appertain ti» about the cost among parents and grandparents as well as students, she articulate.

There is a temporary freeze on fees at £9,250 and that is likely to be present for at least another year during the review.

But there were no signs from wait ons of any radical cutting in the headline price of fees.

Media playback is unsupported on your machination

Labour’s shadow education secretary, Angela Rayner, said the con was an «unnecessary waste of time» and showed that «Theresa May has finally granted that her government got it wrong».

«Labour will abolish tuition remunerations, bring back maintenance grants and provide free, lifelong tutelage in further education colleges,» said Ms Rayner.

But the prime minister said that down to the ground scrapping fees would be unfair and damaging to universities.

She argued it force mean higher taxes for those who did not go to university and would mean universities had to contend for funding with schools and hospitals, with the likely outcome that limits would be put forwarded on the number of university places.

Two-year degrees

Education Secretary Damian Hinds utter he wants «more variety» in the level of fees, rather than hardly all courses and universities charging the maximum amount.

He also calls for assorted flexibility in how courses are delivered, such as two-year degrees, encouraging «commuter degrees» where evaluators live at home and making it easier for part-time students and those who fancy to carry on working while studying.

Former Labour education assist, Lord Adonis, called for a more significant change — arguing that bills should be much lower or abolished, in the way that had happened in Germany.

He accused universities of being «pompous» on high fees and said they needed to «get real» over how much they should mandate.

Lord Adonis rejected the idea of different subjects having strange costs as a «big backward step», which would reduce numbers appropriating for science subjects, if they became more expensive than tricks and humanities.

The tuition fee review also will consider ways of subduing costs such as cutting interest rates on loans and reintroducing continuance grants for disadvantaged students, as well as examining the level of fees.

You capacity also be interested in:

Mrs May said that sure poorer students should give birth to an «equal chance» in higher education — but that at present they had the bestest burden of debt.

Students from poorer families are offered bigger allowances for living costs than better-off students, who are expected to be partly abided by their parents, but it means they graduate with bigger in financial difficulties.

Restoring maintenance grants for poorer students, scrapped last year, force reduce their level of borrowing.

Support for vocational training and apprenticeships in «post-18 instruction» will also be considered.

The prime minister warned that the avenue into further technical and vocational training is «hard to navigate», try to say the standards across the sector «are too varied» and the funding «is patchy».

Media playback is unsupported on your plot

The Treasury select committee, chaired by former education secretary Nicky Morgan, has bring about concerns about the high level of interest rates.

The Institute for Pecuniary Studies says students in England face more than £5,000 in incite charges before they have even left university — giving to average graduate debts of more than £50,000.

Other former Temperate and Labour education ministers Ms Greening, Lord Willetts, Lord Adonis and Charles Clarke include all raised concerns about the level of interest charges.

How do tuition bills work in England?

  • Universities can charge up to £9,250 per year
  • Students do not pay this up-front, but can draw the full amount
  • They can also take a loan for living tariffs
  • Disadvantaged students can borrow more for living costs, on the assumption that better-off followers are supported by their parents
  • Interest of up to 6.1% is charged on loans from when followers start at university
  • Students begin to repay loans once they right to £21,000, with this threshold being raised to £25,000
  • Any unpaid owings are written off after 30 years
  • In Scotland’s universities, there are no wages for Scottish students
  • In Northern Ireland, fees are up to £4,030
  • In Wales, fees are up to £9,000 with map outs for higher levels of maintenance support

Mrs Morgan has also called for assorted support for part-time students, saying that their numbers had «dissolved».

She said that the review needed to find a way to encourage more resiliency in courses and costs, saying that when the fees system was introduced it was «naively fake» there would be be more competition.

‘Variety’ of fee levels

But there deceive been warnings against different levels of fees for sciences or humanities and arts, or for discrete types of university.

Lord Willetts said higher fees for paths with the highest graduate earnings would become a «reverse disciple premium», giving even more money to the most advantaged courses and doctrines.

Sir Anthony Seldon, vice-chancellor of the University of Buckingham, backed calls for assorted flexible approaches — such as two-year degree courses — but warned that home different fee levels would be a «bad idea».

Dame Janet Beer, president of Universities UK, swayed the current system needed to be «better understood and feel fairer to trainees».

The priorities should be support for disadvantaged students and reversing the collapse in legions of part-time and mature students, said the university group leader.

Get info from the BBC in your inbox, each weekday morning

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *