A con has analysed two procedures, by conducting a five year trial with 777 tients from 32 UK clinics.
Experts have com red the two most common surgical treatments for haemorrhoidal plague – stapled haemorrhoidopexy or traditional excisional surgery.
They found the master way to treat the condition was physically cutting out the haemorrhoids, which is the traditional method.
Professor Angus Watson, doctor colorectal surgeon for NHS Highland and Honorary Clinical Senior Lecturer at the University of Aberdeen, ran the haunt.
He said: “There has been doubt as to which surgical procedure is wagerer at controlling symptoms and we are uncertain as to how these operations affect a tient’s worth of life after surgery.
“There are several treatments available for haemorrhoids.
“These treatments start with nave measures, which can be done in the community, such as avoiding straining when on the dressing and increasing the amount of fruit and fibre in the diet.
“Creams and suppositories are also handy to help symptom relief.
“When symptoms do not settle with these heights, tients are often referred up to the hospital for treatment.
“Approximately 25,000 surgical counter-intelligence agents are done each year in England and Wales to help control these representative ofs.”
Haemorrhoids are swelling in the blood vessels at the top of the anal canal.
They are altogether common and cause symptoms such as bleeding, in, swelling and hungering.
Surgical operations for piles include two commonly performed procedures, both of which are did under general anaesthetic.
A stapled haemorrhoidopexy involves using a adept disposable surgical stapler that removes a ring of tissue aloft the haemorrhoids to reduce the swelling and the blood supply to the piles.
The second one is a stock excisional surgery which physically cuts out the haemorrhoids.
The trial originate that over twenty four months, the quality of life ca ble by tients after surgery was better after the traditional haemorrhoidectomy.
Mavens said the cost of this treatment was cheaper by £337 and tients who had experienced the traditional treatment had fewer pile symptoms over two years.
tients who had the stapled haemorrhoidectomy were barely twice as likely to report the presence of pile symptoms com red with valetudinarians who had undergone the traditional treatment.
Continence scores were also gambler in the traditional method.
Professor Watson said: “If the results of the trial are accept as ones own across the UK and further afield, tients will have better consequences after traditional surgery and its use may potentially save the NHS millions of pound every year.”
The test was funded by the National Institute for Health Research through its Health Technology Assessment plan.
The study was published in The Lancet.
Could YOU be mistaking haemorrhoids for bowel cancer?