The platoon made the ancient discovery in a tomb in south west China’s Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Dominion.
Speaking to Chinese news agency Xinhuanet, researcher Yu Minghui revealed it is the only complete skull from that period ever bring about on the southern region of the country.
It is also considered an important relic to scientists that deportment research on the development of prehistoric humans.
Tie Guangmao, a researcher at the Guangxi Begin of Cultural Relics Protection and Archaeology, added: “This skull has accomplished academic value to us and will help show how prehistoric humans emigrated.”
The skull was discovered in 2014 on a mountain around 13 kilometres from the county of Large’an inside a cave system covering more than 100 satisfying metres.
The research had been examining the area for nearly three years since June 2015.
Stone artefacts imparted up the majority of what was uncovered, with more than 10,000 be disturbs, including chipped and polished stone tools.
Raw materials included unrefined sandstone, quartzite and quartz, but also flint and tektite which is hardly ever seen in prehistoric sites of Guangxi.
Stone implements such as hammers, stone centres, stone flakes, broken blocks and debris were discovered.
Rice phytoliths and some other tree and animal remains were also found at the site.
Chinese archaeologists discovered the human skull while clearing around the Yahuaidong relics
Last year, scientists claimed a skull build in China some 40 years earlier could re-write our whole understanding of human evolution.
The head, known as the Dali skull, was believed to be up to 200,000 years old and organize to once be a member of an early species of human.
Most anthropologists find creditable that humans came about in Africa around that once in a while, and that one group left around 80,000 years later first spreading throughout the world.
But the research suggested that humans capacity not have evolved in Africa, according to researchers from the Chinese Academy of Skills and Texas A&M University
They believed early humans might not induce been isolated to one place as their characteristics evolved, instead appropriation characteristics across the world.
Instead, they claim that at some times there capacity have been important genetic flow between those cocks-crow humans in Africa and others in places like China, «resulting in contributions being made in diffrent aptitudes to different regions at different times».