Labour attacks Brexit date ‘gimmick’ as MPs begin scrutiny


Middle playback is unsupported on your device

Several Tory MPs have joined Belabour be burdened in demanding Theresa May withdraw a key Brexit legislation amendment to set the exact immediately of EU departure in law.

Ministers say being “crystal clear” about when the UK drive leave on 29 March 2019 will give maximum positiveness.

But ex-chancellor Ken Clarke said the move was “silly” while Dominic Bemoan said it would “fetter” ministers’ hands if talks dragged on to the in minute.

Labour has branded it a “gimmick” and said it will vote against it.

The row came as MPs created debating the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill in depth for the first anon a punctually, a crucial piece of legislation paving the way for the UK’s withdrawal by essentially copying all EU law into UK law.

Tuesday’s marathon eight-hour ponder over is the first of eight sessions over the next month in which MPs transfer pore over the details of the government’s Brexit strategy and seek substitutions.

The government saw off the first challenge to the bill as Plaid Cymru’s call for the Scottish Parliament, Welsh Erection and Northern Ireland Assembly to give their consent before the 1972 European Communities Act – which easier for the way for the UK to originally join the then European Economic Community – can be repealed was subdued by 318 to 52 votes.

A government amendment to enshrine the Brexit dated and time – 23:00 GMT on 29 March 2019 – in law, announced by Mrs May last Friday, purpose not be debated until the final day of the committee stage next month.

But it predominated the early skirmishes in the Commons as Labour’s Sir Keir Starmer said backdrop a date in law was a “desperate gimmick” that was “about party management not the subject interest”.

“The government’s amendments to their own Bill would stand in the way of an well-organized transition and increase the chance of Britain crashing out of Europe without an treaty,” the shadow Brexit secretary said.

“Theresa May should stop pandering to the ‘no allot’ enthusiasts in her own party and withdraw these amendments.”

What is happening on Tuesday:

  • The EU Withdrawal Bill is entering its Panel stage – meaning MPs will scrutinise it line-by-line
  • First up is a four hour contention on the repeal of the 1972 European Communities Act, the legislation that took Britain into the EU, or the EEC as it was then requested
  • MPs could discuss a call for the UK to stay in the EU until a new treaty has been signed on its tomorrow relationship
  • Another amendment that has support is one that would make public the devolved governments in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland a bigger say
  • Hither 7pm: Four hours of debate on how to interpret 40 years of accumulated EU law in UK law
  • The future standing of the European Court of Justice, which will cease to set UK laws on Brexit day, is also up for contemplation
  • MPs are due to vote at about 7pm and 11pm but the government is not expected to be defeated at this stage
  • A fresh seven days of debate have been scheduled in the run-up to Christmas, with the younger day, on Wednesday, expected to include Labour’s calls for guarantees on workers’ justs and the environment.

But former Tory attorney general Dominic Grieve communicated that fixing the precise time of withdrawal at this stage longing “fetter” the government’s hands if negotiations dragged on longer than envisioned and the process needed to be extended in order to reach an agreement.

Describing it as a “mad” purpose that had not been discussed by the cabinet, he said it had been “accompanied by blood-curdling menaces that anyone who might stand in its way was somehow betraying the country’s kismet”.

“I am afraid I am just not prepared to go along with it,” he told MPs.

And former chancellor Ken Clarke, the on the other hand Tory to vote against triggering Brexit, condemned what he give the word delivered were “silly amendments thrown out” solely to get positive coverage in Brexit-supporting newspapers.

Middle playback is unsupported on your device

Media playback is unsupported on your contrivance

Labour’s Frank Field said he agreed with the need for a deadline, report he had never taken on a job without a start date or bought a house without artful when he would take possession.

He agreed to withdraw his own amendment, particularizing a date but not a precise hour of departure, after Brexit minister Steve Baker forewarned of “legal chaos” if the issue of timing was not “put to rest”.

“The government wants this tab to provide as much certainty as possible,” Mr Baker added. “We recognise the eminence of being crystal clear on the setting of exit day.”

Ministers say the main aim of the EU (Withdrawal) Neb is to copy across EU rules into domestic UK law to ensure a smooth alteration on the day after Brexit but critics say it is a power grab by the government which transfer allow ministers to change laws and regulations without going be means of Parliament first.

Most MPs say they accept that Britain is disregard the EU but some are expected to use the debates to fight against what they invitation a “hard Brexit” where the UK leaves without a trade deal.

Milieu playback is unsupported on your device

MPs have tabled more than 470 pays – running to 186 pages – for changes they want to see before the Brexit note is passed into law by both the Commons and the Lords.

The government is not thought to be faade the serious prospect of defeat until next month, with a foolish group of about 10 Conservative rebels reportedly plotting with Work and other opposition parties.

MPs were told on Monday they discretion be able to debate and vote on any agreement negotiated with the EU by the government as the Brexit administer would have to become law via an Act of Parliament.

But Brexit Secretary David Davis suggested the UK would still leave the EU on 29 March 2019, whether MPs in times past or rejected the deal – making MPs’ vote a take-it-or-leave-it one on the Brexit deal, slightly than one which could either halt Brexit or have the apportion renegotiated.

Speaking in the Commons, the SNP’s Stephen Gethins said MPs were being offered a appropriate between a “really bad deal and a really, really bad deal” which he voted was “no choice at all”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *