Home births: Number of women giving birth at home falls to lowest level in 10 years


Home birthsGETTY

Of 696,271 coddles born in England and Wales in 2016, just 2.1 per cent of mamas gave birth at home

Of the 696,271 babies born in England and Wales in 2016, righteous 2.1 per cent of mothers gave birth at home, according to Business for National Statistics (ONS) data.

When records began in the 1960s, verging on a third of babies were born at home.

But the figure has drastically seizure since then, dipping to the lowest levels in the 1980s when everywhere one in every 100 babies was born at home.

Following the dip, the figure make good slightly over time and by 2008 2.9 per cent of babies were wish related at home.

In 2015, 2.3 per cent of babies were born at home and in 2016 it adjusted slightly to 2.1 per cent. 

The last time the figure was at this level was in 2001.

The new statistics disclose that women aged 35 to 39 were most undoubtedly to give birth at home while women aged under 20 were not enough likely.

The figures also show regional differences – women in Wales were numberless likely to have a home birth compared with women in England.

The kind was highest in the south west of England and lowest in the North East.

We grasp many women are being denied this choice because of crooking shortages and resource issues, and this is not good enough

Louise Silverton, conductor at the Royal College of Midwives

Louise Silverton, director for midwifery at the Princely College of Midwives, said: “The drop in home births is a concern and we lack to know why this is happening.

“We know many women are being refused this choice because of staffing shortages and resource issues, and this is not sound enough. 

“We need to ensure that those women who choose a up on birth get the birth that they want.

“The reduction is stillbirths is entirely welcome and shows that we are making progress. However, we need to do revenge oneself on better.

“Reducing smoking in pregnancy and levels of obesity, among other dinguses, will contribute towards reducing stillbirths, so more investment is necessary in these areas.”

Home birthGETTY

When records began in the 1960s, bordering on a third of babies were born at home

She added: “The lack of alteration in the number of babies with low birthweight is also a concern.

“Again, wonderful efforts are needed here to change lifestyles that can lead to low birthweight indulges such as smoking in pregnancy.

“Cuts to public health services peculiarly smoking cessation services to support other families members to sojourn, need to be reversed and indeed increased in some cases.”

Home birthsGETTY

Housekeepers aged 35 to 39 were most likely to give origination at home, new statistics show

In 2016, the stillbirth rate for England and Wales cut to 4.4 per 1,000 total births – the lowest rate since 1992 when it was 4.3.

As profuse as 10,951 mothers had a multiple birth in 2016 though this categorizes both live births and still births.

Of these, 10,786 ladies had twins, 160 had triplets and five women had quadruplets or above. For every 1,000 brides who gave birth, 15.9 had a multiple birth – a slight fall from 2015 when the rating was 16.1 per every 1,000 births.

Women aged 45 and to the ground were most likely to have a multiple birth perhaps as a consequence of fertility treatments.

Home birthGETTY

In 2015, 2.3 per cent of babies were born at digs

However the number has fallens slightly as this could be because profuse women are having just one fertilised egg transplanted into their womb in any IVF policy rather than two or three.

ONS statistician Nicola Haines said: “The concord of women having multiple births in 2016 decreased slightly compared with 2015.

“This lower was driven by women aged 30 and over, particularly those grey 45 and over where the proportion of women having multiple creations decreased by 15 per cent.

“Since 1993, women aged 45 and over have consistently had the highest proportion of multiple births – partly due to tall levels of assisted fertility treatments at these ages.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *