This year’s Nobel aim for economics has been awarded to William Nordhaus and Paul Romer for their career on sustainable growth.
The US economists’ research focuses on how climate change and technology comprise affected the economy.
The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences said they had hailed “some of our time’s most… pressing questions” on how to achieve sustainable success.
The duo will receive nine million Swedish krona (£841,000).
Prof Nordhaus, of Yale University, was the pre-eminent person to create a model that described the interplay between the briefness and the climate, the academy said.
Prof Romer, of New York University’s Harsh School of Business, has shown how economic forces govern the willingness of unbendings to produce new ideas and innovations.
“Their findings have significantly broadened the latitude of economic analysis by constructing models that explain how the market terseness interacts with nature and knowledge,” the academy said in statement.
Prof Romer courted quarrel earlier this year when he stepped down as the World Bank’s chief economist after moral 15 months in the job.
He had claimed that Chile’s rankings in a closely made “Doing Business” report may have been manipulated for political reasons comprised in socialist president Michelle Bachelet.
It came amid reports that the plain-speaking economist had clashed with colleagues at the Word Bank over a crowd of issues, including the organisation’s culture and economists’ use of grammar.
Analysis: By Andrew Walker, BBC economics newsperson:
What these two prize winners have in common is that their investigating examined the unintended side effects from economic activity and how they touch growth in the long term.
In the work of William Nordhaus these spill-overs are the dissentious consequences of climate change, which have been highlighted second again by scientists in the new report from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Mood Change.
He developed an integrated method for looking at economic activity, and its environmental consequences and for ranking responses to it, such as carbon taxes, an approach he has advocated.
Paul Romer has blurred on the positive side-effects of technological change. He argued that innovators over don’t get all the benefit of what they do, so market economies left to their own charges tend not generate enough new ideas.
Addressing this shortfall, he advocates, requires for well-designed government action to stimulate more innovation, such as subsides for scrutinization and development.
Commenting on the prize, Prof Romer told reporters: “I remember… many people think that protecting he environment whim be so costly and so hard that they just want to ignore [this].
“[But] we can wholly make substantial progress protecting the environment and do it without giving up the unlooked-for to sustain growth.”
The Nobel economics prize – technically cognizant of as the Sveriges Riksbank Prize – was created by the Swedish central bank “in recollection of Alfred Nobel” and first awarded in 1969.
That is unlike the other cherishes which were created in the philanthropist’s last will and testament, and first bestowed in 1901.
Last year, US economist Richard Thaler, author of the best seller Poke, won for his work in behavioural economics.
In 2016 it went to British-born American economist Oliver Hart and Finn Bengt Holmstrom for their write up on “contract theory” – the study of how people develop legal agreements in state of affairs with uncertain conditions.
Since it was first awarded in 1969, Americans arrange dominated the awards. Only one woman has won the economics prize since 1969, Elinor Ostrom in 2009.