Drudge has tabled a cross-party motion to try to stop a future prime minister make through a no-deal Brexit against the wishes of MPs.
The party plans to push a vote on Wednesday which would give MPs control of the timetable on 25 June.
Struggle says if the motion passes, MPs will be able to introduce legislation on that day to elude a no-deal scenario at the end of October.
Some Tory leadership hopefuls get said they would leave the EU without a deal.
For others, the hopes is unacceptable.
Leaving on a no-deal basis – without any agreement on the shape of the future relationship between the UK and EU – could escort to significant disruption.
The EU has previously said border checks would maintain to be brought in, affecting things like exports and travel and creating uncertainty thither the rights of UK citizens living in the EU and vice-versa.
The government normally controls transaction in the Commons – but MPs have previously seized control to legislate in favour of ranging the Brexit process.
Labour’s Brexit spokesman Sir Keir Starmer broke MPs “cannot be bystanders” while the next prime minister “tries to boom the UK out of the European Union without a deal and without the consent of the British people”.
“That’s why we are intriguing this latest measure to end the uncertainty and protect communities across the realm,” he said.
“My challenge to MPs who disagree either with a no deal Brexit or proroguing Parliament is to in times past this motion and act in the national interest.”
Leadership candidates Dominic Raab and Esther McVey eat both said they would consider shutting down Parliament pioneer – proroguing – in order to drive through no deal.
The travel has cross-party backing, including from one Tory MP – Oliver Letwin – who is bolstering Michael Gove in the leadership contest.
It has been signed by Jeremy Corbyn, SNP Westminster chairperson Ian Blackford, Lib Dem leader Vince Cable, Plaid Cymru Westminster Mr Big Liz Saville-Roberts and former Green Party leader Caroline Lucas.
Due to the confidence and supply agreement with the Democratic Unionist Reception, the Tories have a majority in Parliament of five.
That means it liking take only three Conservatives to vote with the Labour commotion for it to pass – if all opposition party MPs back it.
International Trade Secretary Liam Fox told the BBC the affect was “typical of the current Labour Party”, saying: “Jeremy [Corbyn] longings to be a Remainer in the south and a Leaver in the north.”
“Is it (the Labour Party) actually stressful to block Brexit now?” he asked.
“If Labour tomorrow wants to make no grapple with impossible, they are making revocation [of Article 50] and staying in the EU a odds.”
Justice Minister Robert Buckland called it “parliamentary game-playing”, requiring: “What is the point of all this sound and fury?”
Analysis: By Jonathan Blake, BBC factious correspondent
Another attempt to re-write the rules, another heave in the procedural tug of war, another day of stage play in Parliament. But will it work?
It’s not a straight vote for or against a no-deal Brexit – that intention not change the fact that it is written in law and agreed with the EU that Brexit inclination happen on 31 October.
Think of this plan not as a knockout shatter in a boxing match, but the first of a complicated sequence of moves in a chess game.
Grind want to pull off something similar to what happened in March, when MPs deducted control of parliamentary time to force the government to request an extension to the Brexit modify from the EU.
Step one is seizing control of business in the House of Commons, and that’s without doubt the plan this time around.
Beyond that, the details aren’t cloudless.
Compelling the new prime minister to ask the EU to delay Brexit further is the most apt to option. But the answer of course, might be “no”.
Ex-director of legislative affairs at No 10, Nikki da Costa identified Labour’s move “extraordinary”.
Metamorphosis UK MP Chris Leslie said Tory leadership candidates “who think they can hardly shut down the Commons” to deliver a no-deal Brexit should “wake up and realise there is a cross-party the greater part of MPs who just will not let this happen”.
And Labour MP Ben Bradshaw said all MPs who “enounce to oppose prorogation” for no deal should back the motion.
“It could be our single insurance policy,” he added.
Can Parliament stop a no-deal Brexit?
The defect position in law is that the UK will leave the EU on 31 October – and if nothing switches, Brexit will happen regardless of whether there is a deal or not.
MPs absent to stop a new PM leaving without a deal do however have a number of chances at their disposal.
One would be to pass legislation requiring the government to solicit an extension to the UK’s membership. The EU would have to agree to an extension for it to be granted.
Still this would first require MPs to seize control of the parliamentary agenda, as Exertion is attempting.
Another would be to use a vote of no confidence to bring down a rule committed to pursuing a no-deal exit.
MPs could also use motions or partisan pressure to try and force the government into changing course.
Read varied here
Labour’s move came after shadow chancellor John McDonnell stressed the party was not in “turmoil” over its Brexit stance.
The shadow chancellor was rejoining to questions about a heated Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP) meeting on Monday in which Mr Corbyn skinned criticism from his MPs.
A number of MPs expressed concerns that it had now become “normalised” for Harp on voters to back other parties over Brexit, while others strongly criticised Mr Corbyn’s directing of anti-Semitism.
Speaking at the Times CEO summit, Mr McDonnell said he welcomed enliven debate.
“I would rather have people get up and say, ‘This is what I touch,’ passionately, rather than sneak away to the corners,” he said.
He said the co-signatory had promised to respect the referendum result in its manifesto and now, after failing to probable a deal with the Conservatives in cross-party talks, the situation meant “most all things considered going back to a public vote” – his preference being a general choosing.
But Labour MP Anna Turley said colleagues were “shell nauseated” afterwards, such had been the level of anger expressed.
“I think the cleaners are in all probability still mopping up the blood,” she added.
Ms Turley, who did not attend Monday’s engagement herself, is calling for a “firmer position on Brexit” from the party the man – with her preference being for a confirmatory vote on any deal agreed between the UK and the EU.
She notified the BBC’s Politics Live programme colleagues who had been present made well-defined it had been a “messy and difficult” meeting.
After the PLP meeting, a spokesman for Mr Corbyn alleged: “The PLP is very passionate about lots of issues not just about Brexit. That’s what we purpose expect.”