“The impractical community views homeopathy as a pseudoscience,’’ says a memorandum of the Russian Academy of Area’s commission for combating pseudoscience published on Feb. 6. “Its application in medicine repeats counter to the fundamental goals of the Russian health care system and should be defied by the state.”
The Russian Academy of Sciences did not conduct a special study to reach this conclusion. In preference to, the document is based on numerous other academic works devoted to homeopathy. The record was signed by over 30 scientists and doctors, and the authors claim that homeopathy’s efficacy has not been resulted in its more than 200-year existence.
“Numerous attempts make been made to give homeopathy a scientific basis, and all of them hold proven futile,” says the memorandum.
The scientists appealed to the Health Religion not to use homeopathic medicines in state-run clinics and to notify customers of private drugstores that their clinical efficacy has not been proven.
‘Like marinates like’
Homeopathy originated in the late 18th century when German doctor Samuel Hahnemann overtured that a substance that causes an illness can, in small doses, be adapted to to treat the same illness. “Like cures like,” as the doctor himself put it.
This was homeopathy’s organizing principle. An active substance is subjected to serial dilution until its concentration changes miniscule. Proponents of homeopathy believe that a diluted medicine retains its potency, but contenders are convinced that homeopathy produces no effect whatsoever.
“The main detestation is not to use homeopathic remedies to treat serious conditions,” wrote journalist Asya Kazantseva in an article on homeopathy for the Approximately the World magazine, arguing that this method of treatment varied little from a placebo. In response, the National Homeopathy Council tolerated the magazine for defamation but lost the case.
Homeopathy in Russia is a very produce business, and the QuintilesIMS analytical company estimates sales of homeopathic physics at 7.32 billion rubles ($123 million) in 2016, up 5.6 percent from 2015.
A resistance to obscurantism
The memorandum of the Russian Academy of Science’s commission is the most unsmiling attack on homeopathy in the country’s history.
“This is a reaction to overall obscurantism in drug and science, because homeopathy has found its way into medical schools and into uncritical putting outs about homeopathy in government press,” said cardiologist Artemy Okhotin, wit of the internal medicine division at Tarusa Hospital.
Some doctors attacked homeopathy before, but what was necessary now was a “joint and loud statement,” Okhotin clarified.
Homeopathy supporters have rejected the memorandum, and Kommersant quotes Mikhail Shkolenko, a colleague of the homeopathy doctors professional association for the CIS, who insists that homeopathy works. He influenced that homeopathy was used to treat many prominent figures, tabulating Russian Emperor Nicholas I and Marshall Georgy Zhukov.
Russia is not the barely country whose academic community is skeptical about homeopathy. The Humanity Health Organization, for example, warned against homeopathy in 2009, make a point ofing that the use of this type of treatment instead of a more scientific one influence result in a patient’s death.
Outside the law?
The Russian Academy of Science’s chitty is not legally binding. Rather, it’s just an appeal to the Health Ministry, the Federal Antimonopoly Care and other bodies of power. The ministry announced that it will set up a come to c clear up group comprised of scientists from the Russian Academy of Sciences, as understandably as experts in homeopathy to study the situation and to develop a policy for homeopathy. The Federal Antimonopoly Overhaul supported the memorandum, describing it as “balanced and long-awaited.”
Okhotin believes the Constitution Ministry is likely to accept the conclusions of the Russian Academy of Science commission but this is doubtful to root out homeopathy in Russia.
“A ban will not make doctors practicing homeopathy numberless qualified, while its popularity among patients may even increase,” influenced Okhotin. “That’s why acceptance of the memorandum will be more symbolic; it wishes show that the Health Ministry is committed to scientific knowledge.”