Apple walks Ars through the iPad Pro’s A12X system on a chip

The 2018, 12.9-inch iPad Pro.
Stretch / The 2018, 12.9-inch iPad Pro.
Samuel Axon

BROOKLYN—Apple’s new iPad Pro skip about several new features of note, including the most dramatic aesthetic redesign in years, Confronting ID, new Pencil features, and the very welcome move to USB-C. But the star of the teach is the new A12X system on a chip (SoC).

Apple made some big claims about the A12X during its display announcing the product: that it has twice the graphics performance of the A10X; that it has 90 percent nearer multi-core performance than its predecessor; that it matches the GPU power of the Xbox One S competition console with no fan and at a fraction of the size; that it has 1,000 times brisker graphics performance than the original iPad released eight years ago; that it’s faster than 92 percent of all lightweight PCs.

If you’ve read our iPad Pro review, you know most of those claims expand on up. Apple’s latest iOS devices aren’t perfect, but even the platform’s weightiest detractors recognize that the company is leading the market when it check in to mobile CPU and GPU performance—not by a little, but by a lot. It’s all done on custom silicon designed within Apple—a opposite approach than that taken by any mainstream Android or Windows widget.

But not every consumer—even the “professional” target consumer of the iPad Pro—categorically groks the fact this gap is so big. How is this possible? What does this architecture in truth look like? Why is Apple doing this, and how did it get here?

After the munitions announcements last week, Ars sat down with Anand Shimpi from Components Technologies at Apple and Apple’s Senior VP of Marketing Phil Schiller to ask. We necessitated to hear exactly what Apple is trying to accomplish by making its own counters and how the A12X is architected. It turns out that the iPad Pro’s striking, console-level graphics portrayal and many of the other headlining features in new Apple devices (like FaceID and a number of augmented-reality applications) may not be possible any other way.

A top-level view of the A12X

The A12X is, of course, closely coordinated to the A12 from the iPhone XS, XS Max, and XR. The latter was the first silicon made in a 7nm process at ones disposal in a consumer device, and this is the first for a tablet.

The A12X is made up of many components. We’d be in love with to dive deep into exactly how this architecture works, but Apple is conventionally not forthcoming with details like that. Anandtech recently ran a complex analysis of an A12 die shot among other things, but we don’t have anything much the same as that for the A12X yet. Still, we know the big picture. To that end, components of the A12X include:

  • A CPU (significant processing unit), which carries out most instructions that are not specialized to other processing elements.
  • A GPU (graphics processing unit), which handles graphics, from ostentation of the home screen to effects in 3D games to assets for augmented reality dedications
  • The Neural Engine, which handles neural network and machine learning-related assignments
  • An IMC (integrated memory controller), which efficiently manages data present in and out of memory.
  • An ISP (image signal processor), which analyzes images imagined when you take a photo and processes them, improves them, and numberless.
  • The Secure Enclave (also SEP, or secure enclave processor), which handles temperamental data like biometric identifiers in such a way that it is difficult for someone undesirable to access it.
  • There are specific other components, like the display engine, a storage controller, an HEVC decoder and encoder, and profuse, that we won’t get into much detail about here.

Chief number this list are the CPU, GPU, and the Neural Engine, so we’ll focus a bit more on those.


The iPad Pro’s CPU has eight piths—four focused on performance, and four focused on efficiency. And unlike some earlier Apple break ins, all cores can be active at once. This is the first device in this by-product line that uses this many cores simultaneously.

“We’ve got our own custom-designed acting controller that lets you use all eight at the same time,” Shimpi told Ars. “And so when you’re sustained these heavily-threaded workloads, things that you might find in pro workflows and pro assiduities, that’s where you see the up to 90 percent improvement over A10X.”

For single-core execution, Apple’s marketing materials claim that the A12X is 35 percent faster than the A10X. We’ve appear a long way from the 412MHz single-core CPU manufactured by Samsung to Apple’s specifications for the master iPhone in 2007.

We tested the A12X for our iPad Pro review, so let’s look at those benchmarks to clench those claims. First, here are some basic specifications on every emblem included in the tests.


Model SoC
12.9-inch 2018 iPad Pro  Apple A12X
10.5-inch 2017 iPad Pro Apple A10X
12.9-inch 2016 iPad Pro Apple A9X
2018 iPad Apple A10
Samsung Galaxy Tab S4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835


Model SoC
iPhone XS Apple A12
iPhone X Apple A11
iPhone 7 Apple A10
Google Pixel 3 XL Qualcomm Snapdragon 845

Desktops and laptops

2018 15-inch MacBook Pro with Touch Bar Intel Core i9-8950K at 2.9GHz (4.8GHz Turbo) AMD Radeon Pro 560X 4GB GDDR5
2017 15-inch MacBook Pro with Come to earth a detonate Bar Intel Core i7-7820HQ at 2.9GHz (3.8GHz Turbo) AMD Radeon Pro 555 2GB GDDR5
2016 15-inch MacBook Pro with Suspicion Bar Intel Core i7-6820HQ at 2.7GHz (3.6GHz Turbo) AMD Radeon Pro 455 2GB GDDR5
2017 iMac Pro Intel Xeon W at 3GHz (4.5GHz Turbo) AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 16GB HMB2
2017 iMac (5K) Intel Centre i7-7700K at 4.2GHz (4.5GHz Turbo) AMD Radeon Pro 580 8GB GDDR5
2018 Dell XPS 15 2-in-1 Intel Gist i7-8705G at 3.1GHz (4.1GHz Turbo) AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL 4GB HMB2

And now for the results.

We didn’t truly record the claimed 35 percent improvement in single-core performance (supposing this is just one benchmark), but it’s fairly close. The multi-core claim also check up ons out.

This performance is unprecedented in anything like this form piece. In addition to the ability to engage all the cores simultaneously, there’s reason to into that cache sizes in the A12, and likely therefore the A12X, are a substantial banker driving this performance.

You could also make the case that the A12X’s engagement in general is partly so strong because Apple’s architecture is a master elegance in optimized heterogeneous computing—that is, smartly using well-architected, specialized types of processors for identical specialized tasks. Though the A12X is of course related to ARM’s big.LITTLE architecture, Apple has done a lot of run here to get results that others haven’t.

Unfortunately, Apple wouldn’t examine any of that in too much detail with us. Whatever the specifics, this map out does a particularly good job of illustrating why this is remarkable:

Geekbench scores comparing the iPad Pro and recent MacBook Pro models.
Enlarge / Geekbench grooves comparing the iPad Pro and recent MacBook Pro models.
Samuel Axon

The iPad Pro outperforms every MacBook Pro we tested except for the myriad recent, most powerful 15-inch MacBook Pro with an 8th generation Intel Quintessence i9 CPU. Generally, these laptops cost three times as much as the iPad Pro.

“You typically merely see this kind of performance in bigger machines—bigger machines with adherents,” Shimpi claimed. “You can deliver it in this 5.9 millimeter thin iPad Pro because we’ve figured such a good, such a very efficient architecture.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *