Abortion law matter for Stormont, court rules


Belfast’s Court of Prayer has ruled it is not up to the courts to decide on abortion law in Northern Ireland, but up to the Stormont host.

In 2015, the High Court ruled the NI law breached the European Convention on Lenient Rights by not allowing abortion in cases of fatal foetal abnormality or genital crime.

The justice department and the NI attorney general challenged the ruling.

Northern Ireland’s abortion law is much stricter than the remnants of the UK.

On Thursday, three appeal judges allowed an appeal against the discredit court’s ruling that abortion legislation was incompatible with the UK’s Generous Rights Act obligations.

Media playback is unsupported on your device

Degree, in an unusual move, the court invited legal submissions for the case to go to the Maximum Court.

It ruled it was not up to local government, and not the courts, to decide on abortion law.

It chance the complex moral and religious questions behind the issue should be unflinching by a legislature.

The Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission said it was disillusioned by the ruling.

Unlike the rest of the UK, abortion is only permitted in Northern Ireland if a skirt’s life is at risk or there is a permanent or serious risk to her mental or tangible health.

It is unlawful to perform a termination of pregnancy, under section 58 of the Harms against the Person Act 1861, unless on these grounds.

The punishment for playtime the law is life imprisonment.

Right to privacy

The original case was brought by the NI Humane Rights Commission (NIHRC). It cross-appealed and re-introduced all of the original grounds it accomplished before the High Court.

One woman’s story

In 2013, Sarah Ewart travelled to England for a ending after doctors said her unborn child had no chance of survival disguise the womb.

Such a diagnosis, known as fatal foetal abnormality, is not grounds for a licit abortion in Northern Ireland.

Speaking to BBC News NI’s Talkback programme, Sarah thought Appeal Court ruling was «totally devastating» but she would not give up.

She said she was, in any way, encouraged by the court inviting legal submissions for the case to go to the Supreme Court.

Look over more here.

That court agreed that women’s rights to retreat and bodily autonomy under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Settles were breached.

However, the High Court did not find that the happening abortion law breached Article 3, which protects people from torture or barbarous and degrading treatment, or that it breached Article 14, which dust-jackets discrimination.

‘No life to protect’

In January 2016, both the Department of Lawfulness and the Attorney General appealed against the High Court judgment.

The Conditioned by trust in of Justice argued there was a lack of legal certainty in it which could surpass inadvertently to abortion on demand.

It also argued that the ruling on procreant crime was unclear.

The Attorney General said Judge Horner was demonstrably wrong in his decision when he said «there was no life to protect».

He also convinced that there was no proper basis for a doctor to say a foetus had a fatal anomaly.

MPs’ amendment call

Meanwhile, at Westminster, Chancellor Philip Hammond has believed the government intends to fund abortions in England for women from Northern Ireland.

The verbatim followed the Speaker selecting an amendment to the Queen’s Speech relating to access to abortions.

It inspire a request ofs on the government to allow women in Northern Ireland to have abortions for open in England, instead of being charged as they are now.

More than 50 MPs from all the chief parties have signed the amendment, co-ordinated by Labour’s Stella Creasy.

The concession get possession ofed ahead of a vote on the issue in the Commons.

Analysis, BBC News NI Health Newspaperwoman Marie-Louise Connolly

This is a mixed day for Northern Ireland’s abortion campaigners — on both sides of the Donnybrook.

Overthrowing the previous ruling came as a shock to the Northern Ireland Understanding Rights Commission and Amnesty International.

While they had claimed success in 2015 for moving the local abortion story closer in line with the log a few zees Zs of the UK — on Thursday, they said, all that was undone.

Meanwhile, as anti-abortion campaigners were solemnizing at that decision — their feelings quickly turned to absolute fright and disbelief as the news emerged from Westminster.

Read more here.

Earlier this month, the UK’s highest court closely rejected an appeal by a mother and daughter for women from Northern Ireland to show in free abortions on the NHS in England.

The Supreme Court clarified that provisoes on NHS-funded abortion care for Northern Ireland women are not due to economic or constitutional constraints.

Rather, they are based on the secretary of state’s political thoughts and respect for the local assembly.

In a separate case, a judicial review is due to con place in the autumn into the decision to criminally prosecute a woman who allegedly accept abortion pills online for her daughter.

The woman, who cannot be named, is accused of getting and supplying poison in 2013 with the intent to procure a miscarriage contrarious to the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *