In the break of dawn 2010s, nearly half of smartphone owners valued the convenience of animated shopping more than device security. Most smartphone narcotic addicts are even more attached to their devices today than they were years ago. Yet, mobile security concerns have risen. This disquiet on account ofs at least part of its growth to an increase in the number of mobile-related data estrangements, such as the 2016 hack that exposed six million Three Portable customers’ personal information.Organizations now face a dilemma. On the one hand, they must strain to keep up with advancing smartphone technology and help cultivate a plastic workforce. On the other hand, they must craft security game plans that cover employees’ use of mobile devices.To evaluate the challenges of buy with this trade-off, mobile connectivity provider iPass investigated 500 CIOs and senior IT decision makers from the United States, the Allied Kingdom, Germany, and France. The results are presented in the iPass Mobile Safe keeping Report 2017.Here are the main findings from iPass’s survey.Relate to for Mobile SecurityNearly all (93 percent) of respondents in the Mobile Deposit Report 2017 told iPass they were “very” or “degree” concerned about the mobile security challenges associated with a broadening mobile workforce. (47 percent said they were “very” involved, which is up from 36 percent in 2016.)
iPass 2017 Mobile Safe keeping Report page 4Respondents in the United States were by far the most troubled, with 98 percent of this subgroup saying they were “simple” or “somewhat” concerned about mobile security. (58 percent of U.S. respondents were “perfect” concerned.) 89 percent of CIOs and senior IT decision makers from Europe were similarly solicitous, and just 32 percent of UK participants were troubled by mobile surveillance challenges.Concern for C-Level EmployeesNearly half (40 percent) of CIOs and older IT decision makers told iPass that C-level employees are at the highest chance of getting hacked by digital attackers.The mobile connectivity provider has some concerns as to why this is the case:“Contributing factors could include the fact that postpositive major employees have privileged access to highly sensitive and/or valuable corporate text and systems. They also travel regularly for business and tend to be assorted active across multiple mobile devices.”
iPass 2017 Active Security Report page 7German organizations were by far the most bothered about their C-level employees at 49 percent. Companies in France and the Communal States demonstrated near-equivalent percentages of worry for their C-level workers at 41 percent and 40 percent, respectively. Meanwhile, UK firms manifested the least amount of concern at just 29 percent.Concern for Open Wi-Fi Hotspot SecurityThose who took part in iPass’s size up expressed security concerns about using public Wi-Fi hotspots in a sum up of locations. Coffee shops appeared in 78 percent of respondents’ top three fingers ons; 42 percent of CIOs and senior IT decision makers from all countries listed coffee peach ons as number one. Respondents also expressed concern for airports and hotels, while less than half included exhibition centers (41 percent) and in-flight hotspots (34 percent) mid their top three.When asked what public Wi-Fi hotspot surveillance threats concerned them most, more than two-thirds (69 percent) of respondents affirmed man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks. Nearly the same number of participants said a absence of encryption (63 percent). Fewer CIOs and senior IT decision makers acuminate to hotspot spoofing (58 percent) and employees using unpatched/unreliable mobile OS platforms and apps (55 percent).
iPass 2017 Alert Security Report page 6In response to those security threats, 68 percent of over participants currently ban public Wi-Fi hotspots. About a third (31 percent) ban it all the span, whereas a little more than that (37 percent) impede it sometimes. An additional 14 percent of respondents intend to ban public Wi-Fi hotspots in the approaching.Balancing Security with a Mobile WorkforceOrganizations might thirst for to ban public Wi-Fi hotspots, but doing so could jeopardize their vocation goals. iPass elaborates on this possibility:“Modern organizations skilled in that, security risks aside, they need to ensure that their wage-earners remain connected and productive at all times. With the majority of electronic contraptions shipped worldwide being Wi-Fi only, blocking connectivity to Wi-Fi hotspots at coffee shops, lodgings, airports and in flight could result in a drastic reduction in productivity.”Acknowledging this capacity drawback, companies should encourage Wi-Fi connectivity, which may comprise allowing public Wi-Fi hotspots. But they should also stop employees secure their devices against digital threats. On the one handy, they can look to solutions like Virtual Private Networks and portable anti-virus programs. On the other hand, they should consider direct behaving phishing training with their employees on approved desktops and nimble devices.For more insights into how organizations are approaching mobile shelter challenges, please download the iPass Mobile Security Report 2017 here.